高手来帮我看看 这文章前后是否矛盾?

来源:百度知道 编辑:UC知道 时间:2024/06/20 05:39:29
Another important point for lawyers to keep in mind is this: the electronic transactions statutes do not require parties to transact their business electronically. A New York trial court case, DWP Pain Free Med. P.C. v. Progressive Northeastern Ins. Co., illustrates this point. In that case, a health services provider sued an insurance company for benefits under NewYork’s No-Fault Insurance Law. Under that law, an insurance carrier must pay or deny a claim for benefits within 30 days after receipt of the claim. An insurer may request additional verification of a claim within 10 days after receipt. In DWP, the plaintiff submitted its claim for services, and the defendant sent its request for verification. With that request, the insurance company sent a form for the plaintiff to complete and sign. In the verification request, the defendant stated that “electronic signatures are not acceptable.” The plaintiff never returned the signed form.

The plaintiff argued, erroneously, t

不是学法律的,但是案子大概是原告援引联邦法规,坚持被告必须接受电子签名的文件.但是法庭认为,法规规定电子签名可以被接受,但是并不是必须被接受.也就是保险公司有权利不接受电子签名.因此驳回原告申诉.

这是法律的问题。不是英语的问题。你发错地方了