UC知道请求各位大侠帮忙翻译这段英语啊！！着急
来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/06/18 10:02:38
不要在线翻译啊 谢谢合作 这里先给20分 翻译好了我会再追加50分的 谢谢 谢谢
There is probably no need to convince you that computers are changing the way we think about the physical world. The question, ”How can I formulate this problem for a computer?” has lead to new insights into old problems and is allowing us to consider new problems.
We will be the effect of computers in physics education? The most common use of computers has been to assist students to understand topics that have been in the curriculum for many years. So far the computer has not qualitatively changed the way we learn nor the topics we study. Will computer simulation and numerical analysis make analytic methods less important? Has this happened already? Should calculus retain its traditional importance in the curriculum? Do we understand a natural phenomenon when we are able to construct a computer model that allows us to make predictions that agree with experiment? Is it necessary to obtain at least some analytic results? What do you
There is probably no need to convince you that computers are changing the way we think about the physical world. The question, ”How can I formulate this problem for a computer?” has lead to new insights into old problems and is allowing us to consider new problems.
We will be the effect of computers in physics education? The most common use of computers has been to assist students to understand topics that have been in the curriculum for many years. So far the computer has not qualitatively changed the way we learn nor the topics we study. Will computer simulation and numerical analysis make analytic methods less important? Has this happened already? Should calculus retain its traditional importance in the curriculum? Do we understand a natural phenomenon when we are able to construct a computer model that allows us to make predictions that agree with experiment? Is it necessary to obtain at least some analytic results? What do you
有可能不需要说服你知道电脑是改变我们想想这个物质世界。要回答这个问题,“我怎么能制定这个问题已经导致电脑吗?”老问题的新见解,让我们来考虑问题。 我们将在物理效果的电脑吗?最常见的计算机的使用已经将帮助学生了解主题已经在课程已经很多年了。到目前为止已经没有太大的电脑改变了我们学习和研究的课题。计算机仿真和数值分析,将使分析方法更少 重要吗?这种情况吗?应保持其传统的重要性微积分课程吗?我们理解一种自然现象时,我们就可以建设一个电脑模拟,允许我们做出预测,同意实验吗?是否有必要得到至少一些分析结果吗?你认为应该对计算机在教育中所扮演的角色吗? 电脑和视觉影像所产生的计算机模型可以很诱人。然而,我们必须记住,目标是为了了解自然科学。理论和实验已经传统路线,为了达到这一目的,计算已成为第三个和互补的路线。尽管我们已经强调了在本文的计算,要强调的是它的补充作用。我们不能让的迅速发展计算机技术和容易获得的信息荫庇我们的最终目标是获得更多的知识,并有深刻的了解自然的现象。
自己用灵格斯翻吧，
~~~