急 20分···英文翻译 题目关于文理是否分科,发表自己的看法 请高手给翻译成英文

来源:百度知道 编辑:UC知道 时间:2024/06/04 14:48:40
不分科:原因有以下几条:第一,中学应该是通才教育,人应该是全面发展,过早地分科,不利于人才的培养;第二,中学仍然是基础教育,应该让学生学习必要的知识,过早地分科,其实是剥夺了学生学习的权利;第三,中学实行分科后,也不利于人才的选拔。赞成分科的人也大有人在,主要原因是,目前孩子们的学习非常沉重,如果不分科,要学生学习文理科所有的课程,初衷很好,但学生们能吃得消吗?而且经过这些年的分科以后,已经形成了相应的考试规范和教学体系,突然取消分科,结果如何还不得而知,既然如此,还不如在此基础上完善高考制度。
这是内容,帮忙翻译成英文······
如果谁有“关于文理是否分科,发表自己的看法” 这方面的英文内容,请发过来,不用翻译以上文章。谢谢

Regardless of Division: There are several reasons: first, the secondary should be a general education, people should be all-round development of the premature subject, is not conducive to the training; second, is still the basis of secondary education, students should be given the necessary knowledge, premature division, in fact deprived of the rights of students; third, post-secondary school level subjects, is not conducive to the selection of personnel. Division is also in favor of many people, the main reason is that the children's learning very heavy, if, regardless of Division, to all science students to learn the text of the course, a good mind, but students can be able to stand it? And after all these years after the division has created a corresponding system of examinations and teaching norms, the abrupt cancellation of the division, the outcome is not yet known, being the case, not as good as on the basis of improving the college entrance examination system.