UC知道各位好人，时间紧迫帮忙翻译一下
来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/06/01 16:16:05
Over the last decade, a new theory has become popular
amongst immunologists. It is called the Danger Theory,
and its chief advocate is Matzinger [18], [19] and [20]. A
number of advantages are claimed for this theory; not
least that it provides a method of ‘grounding’ the immune
response. The theory is not complete, and there are some
doubts about how much it actually changes behaviour and
/ or structure. Nevertheless, the theory contains enough
potentially interesting ideas to make it worth assessing its
relevance to Artificial Immune Systems.
It should be noted that we do not intend to defend this
theory, which is still controversial [21]. Rather we are
interested in its merits for Artificial Immune System
applications and hence its actual existence in the humoral
immune system is of little importance to us. Our question
is: Can it help us build better Artificial Immune Systems?
Few other Artificial Immun
amongst immunologists. It is called the Danger Theory,
and its chief advocate is Matzinger [18], [19] and [20]. A
number of advantages are claimed for this theory; not
least that it provides a method of ‘grounding’ the immune
response. The theory is not complete, and there are some
doubts about how much it actually changes behaviour and
/ or structure. Nevertheless, the theory contains enough
potentially interesting ideas to make it worth assessing its
relevance to Artificial Immune Systems.
It should be noted that we do not intend to defend this
theory, which is still controversial [21]. Rather we are
interested in its merits for Artificial Immune System
applications and hence its actual existence in the humoral
immune system is of little importance to us. Our question
is: Can it help us build better Artificial Immune Systems?
Few other Artificial Immun
一下为机译：
在过去十年中，一个新理论，已成为热门
除免疫。这就是所谓的危险理论，
其首席提倡Matzinger [ 18 ] ， [ 19 ]和[ 20 ] 。字母a
众多的优势都声称对这一理论;不
至少，它提供了一个方法'接地'免疫
反应。理论并不完整，有一些
怀疑多少实际变化的行为和
/或结构。然而，理论包含足够的
可能感兴趣的想法，使之价值评估
相关的人工免疫系统。
应当指出的是，我们不打算捍卫这一
理论上讲，这是仍有争议[ 21 ] 。而我们
其优点有兴趣的人工免疫系统
应用，因此它的实际存在体液
免疫系统是没有什么意义。我们的问题
是：帮助我们建立更好的人工免疫系统？
其他一些人工免疫系统从业人员
意识到危险
在过去的十年里,一个新的理论已经变得流行起来
在免疫学家。它被称为危险理论,
和其主要拥护者则Matzinger[d],[m].北京:19]和[2000]。一个
许多优点是声称对这个理论;不是
至少,它提供了一种“接地”免疫
响应。这个理论是不完整的,还有一些
怀疑是多少改变行为和
/或结构。不过,这个理论含有足够的
潜在的有趣的想法是值得评估它的
人工免疫系统的相关性。
值得注意的是,我们不打算防守
理论,它仍然是有争议的(21)。而我们
其优点感兴趣的人工免疫系统
应用程序,因此它的实际存在的体液
免疫系统并不重要。我们的问题,
它能帮助我们是:建立更好的人工免疫系统吗?
一些其他的人工免疫系统的工作者
意识到危险理论、例外
伯吉斯[5],Willamson(22)。因此,这是