UC知道求人给翻译一下
来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/06/21 00:43:42
CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS IN USING THE CIPP MODEL
There are four key factors in successfully conducting a program evaluation
that is based on the CIPP model:
• Create an evaluation matrix, such as the one illustrated in Tables 1 to 4, for
the nursing program and make it a living document.
• Form a working group working group or a Program Evaluation Committee.
Membership should include representatives of all partner institutions, if the
nursing program is offered in a collaborative or consortium model. The
Committee gives input; develops and implements the program evaluation
plan; receives the program evaluation report;.and makes recommendations
arising from the report.
• Determine who will conduct the evaluation. There are two types of evaluators;
those working within an organization and those commissioned externally,
usually called internal and external evaluat
There are four key factors in successfully conducting a program evaluation
that is based on the CIPP model:
• Create an evaluation matrix, such as the one illustrated in Tables 1 to 4, for
the nursing program and make it a living document.
• Form a working group working group or a Program Evaluation Committee.
Membership should include representatives of all partner institutions, if the
nursing program is offered in a collaborative or consortium model. The
Committee gives input; develops and implements the program evaluation
plan; receives the program evaluation report;.and makes recommendations
arising from the report.
• Determine who will conduct the evaluation. There are two types of evaluators;
those working within an organization and those commissioned externally,
usually called internal and external evaluat
在使用过程中出现的关键成功因素的CIPP模型 有四个关键成功因素进行了评定 这是基于CIPP模型。 •创造一种评价矩阵,诸如在表1 - 4 护理程序,使它成为你生活的文件。 形成了一个工作组•工作组或项目评估委员会。 成员应包括所有合作伙伴的代表机构,如果 护理程序提供一个合作或财团的模型。这个 委员会给输入,制定并实施项目评估 计划;受到项目评估报告;而且提出建议 从报告中出现。 决定谁将•评价。有两种类型的议题。 这些工作的组织的内部和外部委托, 通常称为内部和外部的议题。每一种都有它 利与弊。熟悉的内部产生的程序 在收集数据,但客观性可能会受损。外部 系统会更昂贵,但不可能屈服于压力 有问题的评价(Posavac和凯利,2003年)。如果成本 可行性问题,这个项目评估委员会可以收集数据 代表外部评估人。译:相反的指派 评价一个人,全部责任的方方面面 评估可能给这个项目评估委员会。
等着别人帮你用机译吧。。