UC知道进来看看这道GRE类比
来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/05/27 17:39:41
这道类比,实在受不了,宋昊的书上前后出现2次,答案居然还都不一样
badger bother
A persecute injure
C belabor mention
badger: to harass or annoy persistently
persecute:t o annoy with persistent or urgent approaches (as attacks,pleas, or importunities)
belabor : to explain or insist on excessively
urgent approaches as attacks
这里都写了 attacks
injure 有什么不合适的?
疯了, 现在回答里都有不一样的了.
badger bother
A persecute injure
C belabor mention
badger: to harass or annoy persistently
persecute:t o annoy with persistent or urgent approaches (as attacks,pleas, or importunities)
belabor : to explain or insist on excessively
urgent approaches as attacks
这里都写了 attacks
injure 有什么不合适的?
疯了, 现在回答里都有不一样的了.
看了两天宋昊君的反义，以近似痴呆的状态爬上来想来问个问题，结果碰上老兄在这里问类比，更加崩溃的说。
这个题我觉得是这样的，injure强调结果，persecute除了per-的词根表示持续以外呢，还有蓄意的意思。而且injure强调身体上造成伤害的既定事实，且无“故意”之义。请看英文解释：
persecute：
If someone is persecuted, they are treated cruelly and unfairly, often because of their race or beliefs.
If you say that someone is persecuting you, you mean that they are deliberately making your life difficult.
injure :
If you injure a person or animal, you damage some part of their body.
C呢就很合适题干了，都是同一行为在强度和时间上的加重，嗯嗯，现在已经基本上不说人话了，你能明白意思就好。
说得简单点：
题干：badger意为不断地bother(persistently)
C:belabor意为过分冗长地说(excessively),和题干对应，选C
A:persecute如果按你的解释它没有受伤的意思，如果按迫害解的话，它就没有持续的意味，所以总会少个条件，故A不对。
我感觉A里的 injure不太合适
这题肯定选A，
C里面没有必然关系，这个题考的是是动词和名词的因果关系，烦扰（v）造成烦扰（n），迫害造成伤害，mention和belabor没有必然的因果关系