高赏速求英译中

来源:百度知道 编辑:UC知道 时间:2024/09/23 06:05:36
Now, understandably many of these products are not so much Designed as driven by engineering requirements, cost, and short timelines. They were created, but without Design in mind. Functions and features most likely dominated the development process rather than ease of use and quality of experience. I would venture again that the user was not really put at the forefront because it is not ease to measure their experience, thus the "rational" mindset ends up driving development by functionality alone because it is simple to quantify. Also much of the "piling up" of Tangentially formed products today is directly proportional to the tools (solid modeling software) that designers and engineers are using to conceive and implement ideas. So development tools and marketing features are dictating customer experiences instead of the other way around.
Remember that the Tangent category does not exist in nature in pure form: it is a mental construction from man's imagi

现今这类产品的理所当然由工程要求,成本和短期时间表决定,而非是固定模式.
它们应是具创造性的,而非信赖于脑中的条条框框.
功能和特点最有可能占发展进程的主导地位,而非易用性和质量的优越.
我要冒大不讳地说,用户没很难以他们的经验为主导,因为这太不可测了,但是这种“理性”心态最终会推动功能的改善,因为其是单一量化过程
其实如今许多“堆积”的切线形式产品正是设计师和工程师们为了便捷和实用而直接使用(实体建模软件)的成果
因此,开发工具和营销功能要求客户体验,而非其它。
注意切线目标并不是以自然是纯物质的形式存在的,他是从人类的想象中构图,从设计产品发展的简单任务中抽象功能。
早期的CAD,是以心理结构,工业制造和20世纪物质再生产演化而来几何直线和圆弧。
这是根本的包豪斯理念:只谈“功能决定形式。 ”虽然我觉得深被这句话的务实精神感动,我觉得它很偏激。这并不普遍适用,这所代表的只是世界的可测性。

不好意思,最近很忙都没能给你发上来。恩,最迟后天,尽量明天就把答案传上来。