法律在线翻译 PERSENTATION2
来源:百度知道 编辑:UC知道 时间:2024/06/12 04:28:14
3、关于巨额财产来源不明罪证明责任分担之比较我国刑法第395条第1款关于巨额财产来源不明罪的规定。依据该款规定,国家工作人员的财产或者支出明显超过合法收入,差额巨大的,可以责令其说明来源。本人不能说明其来源是合法的,差额部分以非法所得论,处5年以下有期徒刑或者拘役,财产的差额部分予以追缴。也就是说,对于巨额财产来源不明罪,犯罪嫌疑人负有说明其明显超过合法收入的那部分财产的来源的责任,如果不能说明来源是合法的,则以巨额财产来源不明罪论处。这是典型的证明责任倒
2, on the property, the obligation to declare whether or not a huge amount of property of unknown origin as the crime of conviction of the premise of the comparison of the legal system in China, the CPC Central Committee General Office and the State Council General Office of the documents issued by the criminal law can not be used as sources of law can not be convicted as a sentencing court trial basis. The above-mentioned party and government leaders on the provisions of the declaration of income, even if a violation can only be given to the party and government discipline, therefore, declare the obligation on the property can not be used as a huge amount of property of unknown origin a prerequisite for the crime of conviction. For the national staff of unknown origin will be a huge amount of property crimes, not because of its property in violation of the obligation to declare, but because the firm grasp of the judiciary in its possession a huge income gap between its legitimate p