gre arguement 141

1. 错误因果，CCC不一定会带来pollution。CCC’s mining activities do not necessarily lead to pollution and environmental disaster。可能用什么先进tech。No evidence CCC will cause pollution and environmental disaster, it might use advanced technology to mine copper

2. 结论不可行1）consumers难分辨copper的公司。for a normal consumer, he/she can not distinguish which copper are from CCC and which are not since CCC only provide the rough material for industry and commercial use. 因为只提供原料The products after process will marked by other companies. 2）consumers也不一定会配合。it is unlikely that the consumers can really boycott the products of CCC

3. 结论无理，可能CCC出口，CCC might still gain their profit by selling their copper to other regions and countries which pay less attention to environment in West Fredonia.2）即使最后abandon了，可能坏境已经被破坏了，disaster已经造成了

———————————————————————————————————

另外攻击点应该选重要且明显的，只要抓住这点，管它无不无脑呢