UC知道这颗钻石我买的价格值吗？
来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/05/09 03:50:50
下面这个是证书，我看不懂，我8500买的裸钻，不知道划算不？还有这颗钻石如何？
GIA Report Check
GIA Report Number: 17102953
Report Type: GIA Diamond Dossier®
Date of Issue: April 24, 2008
Laser Inscription Registry: GIA 17102953
Round Brilliant
Measurements: 5.22 - 5.25 x 3.20 mm
Carat Weight: 0.53 carat
Color Grade: K
Clarity Grade: VVS1
Cut Grade: Excellent
Proportions:
Depth: 61.1%
Table: 58%
Crown Angle: 33.5°
Crown Height: 14.0%
Pavilion Angle: 41.2°
Pavilion Depth: 43.5%
Star length: 50%
Lower Half: 80%
Girdle: Medium to Slightly Thick, Faceted (4.0%)
Culet: None
Finish:
Polish: Very Good
Symmetry: Excellent
Fluorescence: Medium Blue
Clarity Characteristics:
Pinpoint, Cloud
Important Limitations
GIA Report Check is intended solely to help confirm that the report number and carat weight provided by t
GIA Report Check
GIA Report Number: 17102953
Report Type: GIA Diamond Dossier®
Date of Issue: April 24, 2008
Laser Inscription Registry: GIA 17102953
Round Brilliant
Measurements: 5.22 - 5.25 x 3.20 mm
Carat Weight: 0.53 carat
Color Grade: K
Clarity Grade: VVS1
Cut Grade: Excellent
Proportions:
Depth: 61.1%
Table: 58%
Crown Angle: 33.5°
Crown Height: 14.0%
Pavilion Angle: 41.2°
Pavilion Depth: 43.5%
Star length: 50%
Lower Half: 80%
Girdle: Medium to Slightly Thick, Faceted (4.0%)
Culet: None
Finish:
Polish: Very Good
Symmetry: Excellent
Fluorescence: Medium Blue
Clarity Characteristics:
Pinpoint, Cloud
Important Limitations
GIA Report Check is intended solely to help confirm that the report number and carat weight provided by t
这个钻石的大小，切工和净度都不错，对于半克拉的钻石价格也不算贵。但是它之所以便宜是因为颜色K实在是很差了，有荧光也不好，而且是Medium Blue 。品质大打折扣。但是是有说法有荧光的对于差的颜色可以起到弥补的作用。但是这枚钻石给人的感觉很有缺陷。如果是我，肯定不喜欢。宁愿要一个30分各项指标都比较满意的钻石，和你这个价格差不多。如果是婚戒，我对这个钻石是很不满意的。看你老婆的想法了。
这颗钻石的大小是0.53克拉的，净度：VVS1，挺好。颜色：K，差。切工和对称都是完美，抛光是很好。这颗钻石还有中度蓝色荧光。对于大分数的钻石来说，有荧光其实不是很好。太宽比和全身比还可以。这颗钻石颜色太差，净度那么高，真是有点浪费，楼主可以买净度稍低，颜色稍高点的钻石。个人建议，呵呵！8500这个价格也可以接受，不过，应该还能便宜点的，呵呵！
颜色太差,不值
以9月份钻石报价7800左右(23*100*0.53*6.8)