UC知道跪求高手帮忙翻译哲学英文文章！
来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/06/16 01:33:52
Ecological Economics 24 (1998) 153–162
Anthropocentrism with a human face
Per Ariansen *
Uni6ersity of Oslo, Department of Philosophy, PO Box
1020, N-0316 Blindern, Oslo, Norway
Abstract
There is a widely held belief that there are moral limits to what we can do to non-human living beings. This has
inspired various varieties of non-anthropocentric ethics. Whether rights-or welfare-oriented, the focus has been on
the organisms’ interests. The ability of these theories to explain the moral significance of interests and, more generally,
to identify the source of obligation in ethics, is questioned. The metaphor of a game is provided, with the rules of a
game, as a model for what can give obligational significance. A Kantian-oriented view of ethics is developed from the
model, providing a source for inter-human liberty-rights. Concerning such rights, animals are clearly neither agents
nor patients. It is argued that in
Anthropocentrism with a human face
Per Ariansen *
Uni6ersity of Oslo, Department of Philosophy, PO Box
1020, N-0316 Blindern, Oslo, Norway
Abstract
There is a widely held belief that there are moral limits to what we can do to non-human living beings. This has
inspired various varieties of non-anthropocentric ethics. Whether rights-or welfare-oriented, the focus has been on
the organisms’ interests. The ability of these theories to explain the moral significance of interests and, more generally,
to identify the source of obligation in ethics, is questioned. The metaphor of a game is provided, with the rules of a
game, as a model for what can give obligational significance. A Kantian-oriented view of ethics is developed from the
model, providing a source for inter-human liberty-rights. Concerning such rights, animals are clearly neither agents
nor patients. It is argued that in
生态经济学(1998)24人类与人性153-162元ariansenuni6ersity*奥斯陆、哲学系、 1020信箱、氮0316blindern,奥斯陆, 挪威有一个抽象普遍认为,有道德信仰如何限制非人类生活的赞歌. 本次大赛各品种非人类道德. 无论权利或福利型,人们已对生物体的利益. 这些理论能否解释道德的意义和利益,更普遍 找出源头道德义务,是质疑. 游戏是一种比喻,与一个游戏规则, 作为一个模式能给什么义务性的意义. 一康德的观点是从道德的模范,为源泉跨人身自由权. 对于这种权利,显然不是动物也不例代理商. 有人辩称间的关系,也涉及人类道德福利问题. 其实伦理意义取决于福利方面. 预订慈悲道德伦理的主要工作方向: 带出某一境界的慈悲爱心与道德要求下股权. 这项努力要求尊重他人所有的福利,包括非人类. 它进一步谴责肆意破坏,即使不被有情是受害者. 动植物与环境的表面受益者是跨人类道德. 道德问题,道德是一种信仰的人,从而融入大自然的关系是一种人类伦理. . 1998elsevier科学乙诉关键词:人类中心; 康德为本道德1. 言为居民提供一个现代社会,我们正处在一个日益不安与自然的关系. 我们正处于与一家重量级冠军的荣誉,但一向蓬勃奖金、 打,击败所有参赛选手已没有任何对手对抗. 年底奖金. 年底的荣誉. 在涉及虐待的性质,我们作为冠军,甚至不能再寻求职业, 但发现自己绑在病人和交织在一种新的责任. 大自然是兴盛于我们手中.