高手帮我翻译一段话，不要软件翻译的

来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/05/05 04:10:36
The specific question raised by Martinez-Alier (1995) is whether an ‘ecological balance of payments’ analysis would show that the US and Japan, which exhibited positive genuine savings in the analysis of Pearce and Atkinson (1993) (and World Bank, 1997), were actually unsustainable when global resource flows are taken into account. A more formal analysis is proposed by Klepper and Stahler (1998) who show that a resource importer, which perhaps is leaving its own resources intact as a result of a (unilateral) restriction on the use of domestic uses, could be characterised as ‘buying’ sustainability at the expense of a resource exporter. In terms of measure¬ment, by modelling the total value of resource trade between countries, one response to this debate might be that — in the genuine savings framework — it is the savings of a resource importer that should be debited for use of a resource (Proops et al., 1999; Proops and Atkin¬son, 1998; Bailey and Clarke, 2000). However, it is

由Martinez-Alier (1995)具体提出的问题是,"生态收支平衡"分析是否真的可以证明美国,日本,这两个曾在Pearce and Atkinson 分析中准确报出真实储蓄的国家,即使全球的资源流程也被考虑进去，仍面临着不可持续发展的危机.由Klepper and Stahler (1998)做的一个更为正式的分析显示,一个资源输入者者,很可能保全自己的资源造成国内资源使用的单向制约,这种行为叫做牺牲资源输出者的利益,"买"可储蓄发展!在定义方面,在国家间拟订全部资源价值的模型,他可能会对此做这样的回应---在真正的储蓄结构中---应该给资源输入者的帐户借方记入使用资源的数目.但为何一个资源输入国家的储蓄率会沦落到本不该有的"反映资产贬值"情况?仍不为人知.所以这个情况的常规分析就有错误.对输出国家的天然资源的强烈要求可以似真实地带领如此的一个国家到"不可持续发展"的地步,除非是它本身的政策有不足之处---像自然资源的开采权使用费没有被征收,资源任期是不安全的，或者资源租金没被投资在其他的方面.

注:没有用软件翻
其中没翻过来的的人名..

546546stock of the exporting country) that does not belong to it, so the logic of the question may be faulted. Strong demand for the natural resources of an exporting country could plausibly lead such a country down an unsustainable path, but only if its own policies arresource importer that should be debited for use of a resource (Proops et al., 1999; Proops and Atkin¬son, 1998; Bailey and Clarke, 2000). However, it is unclear wimporter that sh