翻译成英语 关于医学的

来源:百度知道 编辑:UC知道 时间:2024/06/05 15:58:44
目的: 探讨组胺激发试验 — 气道阻力的测定在学龄前小儿哮喘诊断和疗效判定中的应用
方法 : 利用意大利 MEFAR MB3激发仪和德国产的Microloop肺功能仪对42例已经诊断为哮喘的病例(其中支气管哮喘27例,咳嗽变异性哮喘15例)和21例健康对照组进行组胺激发试验 — 气道阻力的测定,比较他们之间差异并评价在疗效判定中的价值
结果: 哮喘组和咳嗽变异性哮喘组的气道阻力变化与健康对照组相比较均有统计学意义(F=48.466 P<0.001 )哮喘组治疗3个月以后较治疗前其气道阻力显著降低( t=10.405 P<0.005 )
结论: 组胺激发试验 — 气道阻力的测定在学龄前小儿哮喘的诊断和疗效判定中具有非常良好的应用价值.
关键词: 组胺激发试验 — 气道阻力的测定,学龄前小儿,哮喘诊断,疗效判定

以下是我自己翻译的,由于我不是医学专业的所以有些东西不太懂,语法上可能还有问题,请高手帮助!

Abstract:
Objective: To study the application of histamine provocation test-airway resistance measurement in preschool children’s asthma diagnosis and therapeutic efficacy.

Methods: Compare histamine provocation test-airway resistance measurement by the Italian MEFAR MB3 provocating instrument and Germen Microloop lung function instrument for the 42 cases that were diagnosed as asthmatic and the healthy group of 21 cases, and estimate the differences between the two groups and the value of the therapeutic efficacy.

Objective : Discussion histamine provocation test-airway resistance measured in the diagnosis and treatment of preschool children with asthma, the application : Stir MEFAR NG Italy and Germany to stimulate the production of the 42 cases have Microloop spirometre The diagnosis of asthma patients (27 patients with bronchial asthma. 15 patients with cough variant asthma), and 21 healthy control group histamine provocation test-airway resistance measured They compared the efficacy and to evaluate the difference between the value of the results : asthma and cough variant asthma airway resistance compared with the healthy control group were statistically significant (F=48 . 466 0.001) asthma treatment three months after treatment, their airway resistance decreased significantly (t = 10 . 405 P <0.005) : histamine provocation test-airway resistance measurement in the diagnosis and treatment of preschool children with asthma have very good application value.

你所翻译的,在语法上基本上没什么问题,但是有些