UC知道英文翻译 谢谢了
来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/05/09 04:49:31
3.4 Birds
During 1991–1997, the survival (Eeva and Lehikoinen 1998) and behaviour (Eeva et al. 2000a) of two hole-nesting passerines, Pied Flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca Pallas) and Great Tit (Parus major L.) were studied around Harjavalta. F. hypoleuca was more susceptible to pollutants than P. major, the response of which was weaker in many aspects. The breeding success of P. major was below background levels up to 3–4 km from the smelter (Eeva and Lehikoinen 1996) whilst F. hypoleuca was affected severely only next to the smelter (ca 1 km) (Eeva and Lehikoinen 1995, 1996). No clear differences in the female condition (Eeva et al. 1997b), and in the density of ectoparasites in the nests (Eeva et al. 1994) of these two bird species in relation to the pollution were found. The different responses of these two bird species were probably due to their different diet (Eeva and Lehikoinen 1996).
During 1991–1997, the survival (Eeva and Lehikoinen 1998) and behaviour (Eeva et al. 2000a) of two hole-nesting passerines, Pied Flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca Pallas) and Great Tit (Parus major L.) were studied around Harjavalta. F. hypoleuca was more susceptible to pollutants than P. major, the response of which was weaker in many aspects. The breeding success of P. major was below background levels up to 3–4 km from the smelter (Eeva and Lehikoinen 1996) whilst F. hypoleuca was affected severely only next to the smelter (ca 1 km) (Eeva and Lehikoinen 1995, 1996). No clear differences in the female condition (Eeva et al. 1997b), and in the density of ectoparasites in the nests (Eeva et al. 1994) of these two bird species in relation to the pollution were found. The different responses of these two bird species were probably due to their different diet (Eeva and Lehikoinen 1996).
3.4 鸟 在1991-1997, 生存(Eeva 和Lehikoinen 1998) 并且行为(Eeva 等2000a) 二只孔嵌套passerines, 染色Flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca Pallas) 并且伟大的山雀(Parus 期间主要L 。) 被学习了在Harjavalta 附近。F. hypoleuca 比P. 少校是易受污染物, 反应是微弱的在许多方面。P. 少校的育种的成功是在背景水平之下3-4 公里从精炼工(Eeva 和Lehikoinen 1996) F. hypoleuca 影响了严厉地只在精炼工(加州旁边1 公里) (Eeva 和Lehikoinen 1995 年, 1996) 。清楚的区别在女性情况上(Eeva 等1997b), 和在密度上体外寄生虫在巢(Eeva 等1994) 这两个鸟种类关于污染未被发现。这两个鸟种类不同的反应大概归结于他们的另外饮食(Eeva 和Lehikoinen 1996)