还有一段文字要翻，行行好吧！

来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/06/24 01:53:16
Following study of the concept of “pro-poor” economic growth and its application to particular countries at UNDPs International Poverty Centre (see for example Son and Kakwani, 2004, Kakwani, Khandker and Son, 2004 and Vandemoortele, 2004), a cross-country analysis of 80 countries was completed. In these countries a total of 237 spells of economic growth were examined. In 106 the average real per capita income actually declined. In 131, pro-poor growth, i.e. proportionately more of the average increase in income going to the poorest deciles, could be reliably confirmed for only 55 — or 23% of the total — while less of the average increase in income went to the poorest deciles in the remaining 76 countries (32% of the total). Growth in these countries was “anti-poor” (Sonand Kakwani, 2006 forthcoming).

"赞成穷的" 经济增长的概念的随后而来的研究和它的在特殊国家的应用在UNDPs 国际贫穷中心(参见例如儿子和Kakwani, 2004 年, Kakwani 、Khandker 和儿子2004 年并且Vandemoortele 2004), 对80 个国家的横越全国的分析被完成了。在每共计237拼写经济增长的这些国家被审查了。在106 平均真正的国民平均收入实际上下降了。131, 赞成穷的成长, 即均衡地更多在收入的平均增长量去最粗劣的deciles, 能可靠地被证实为只55 - 或23% 共计- 当无足轻重在收入的平均增长量去最粗劣的deciles 在残余的76 个国家(32% 共计) 。成长在这些国家是"反穷的" (Sonand Kakwani, 2006 即将到来) 。