还有一段翻译谢谢

来源:百度知道 编辑:UC知道 时间:2024/05/31 19:02:18
This tremendous expansion could not have been possible without ready compliance with income tax laws and effective administration.In many countries where compliance is poor and administration is weak, there is great reluctance to rely heavily on the income tax. In this country, the record of compliance is good—although it can still be improved—and practical methods have been developed for administering a mass income tax (at a cost of only about 1/2 of 1 percent of tax collected). In the late 1930’s many people—even high-placed officials of the Internal Revenue Service—doubted that an income tax covering almost everyone could be administered effectively. Although some problems remain, in an advanced country the administrative feasibility of an individual income tax of almost universal coverage is no longer questioned.
There are good economic reasons for using the income tax as a major source of revenue. The automatie flexibility of the income tax promotes economic stability and the

这个巨大的扩展不能全赖愿意遵守所得税法和有效管理中,许多国家 凡履约差和管理基础薄弱,因此是极不情愿地依赖所得税. 在这个国家, 记录遵好--虽然它仍然可以得到改善和实用的方法已制定了管理质量 所得税(按成本仅约1 / 2 1 %的税款) . 在1930年底的很多人,甚至高级官员设置的国内税收服务表示怀疑所得税涵盖几乎人人 可以有效管理. 尽管一些问题依然存在, 在一个先进的国家行政上的可行性,是个人所得税的几乎全面普及已不再质疑. 有良好的经济原因而使用的个人所得税作为一个主要收入来源. 该自动灵活的税收收入,促进经济稳定和累进税率有助于防止过分集中的经济 权力和控制. 有的认为,所得税,还需要适度的增长,私人储蓄高收入的人, 这是可能保有私人需求的货物和服务.其他人相信高所得税,降低工作 投资诱因,因此,降低了国家的经济增长. 这是一个困难的问题将在晚些时候讨论. 但是,它说是正确的现代个人所得税. 如果经过精心设计和良好的管理,是一个有力而必要的经济手段,为现代知识经济工业 . 结构的联邦所得税