哪位救救我啊?帮忙翻译一段英文。非常感谢

来源:百度知道 编辑:UC知道 时间:2024/05/20 00:17:11
Using population-weighted distributions of per capita income (from national accounts) is a step in the right direction, but it is not sufficient to provide accurate estimates of concepts like poverty rates or indexes of income inequality. These measures still miss within-country dispersion, a factor that needs to be included if sensible estimates of the WDI are to be constructed.
By using population weights, researchers recognize that different countries have different population sizes, but this alone is insufficient because it still implicitly assumes that all citizens of a country have the same level of income. This can yield misleading results. If the per capita income in a country were a couple of dollars above the poverty line, for example, researchers would conclude that no poor citizens lived in that country. Similarly, they would tend to find dramatic declines in poverty rates as the income per capita of very populated countries grew from a few dollars below to a few doll

使用国民平均收入的人口被衡量的发行(从全国帐户) 是步在正确的方向, 但它不是充足提供概念的准确收入不平等估计象贫穷率或索引。这些措施仍然错过在之内国家分散作用, 需要包括的因素如果WDI 的易察觉的估计将被修建。
由使用人口重量, 研究员认为, 不同的国家有不同的人口大小, 但这单独是不足的因为它含蓄地仍然假设, 国家的所有公民有同样收入标准。这可能产生引入歧途的结果。如果国民平均收入在国家是两三美元在贫困线之上, 例如, 研究员会认为, 可怜的公民没有居住在那个国家。同样, 他们会倾向于发现剧烈的衰落在贫穷率当收入非常居住于的国家如下人均增长从几美元对几美元在贫困线之上。另外, 根据不平等, 不平等人口被衡量的索引能显示衰落在整体全球性不平等, 当真实的各自的不平等能上升如果在之内国家不平等充足地增加了。