UC知道案例分析 (英语)
来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/06/24 01:42:27
Mark owned some farmland outside the city. He was interested in selling the land, so he told the first buyer, Jim, that the state was going to build a road around the city that would go directly through this land, making it more valuable. Mark told Jim that he would like to hold on to the land until the road was built, but he needed money desperately. Based on Mark’s statements, Jim bought the land for A$2,000 per acre. As farmland, it was worth only A$1,000 per acre, but with a new road, it would be worth A$5,000 per acre. Mark knew that there were no plans for a new road and when Jim learns of this he sues Murphy. Discuss whether Jim has any grounds to sue Mark for compensation.
The ELEMENT is:
.
The PRINCIPLE is:
In this case:
The relevant PRECEDENT is:
THEREFORE: (5 marks)
(name of student who completed this question)
The ELEMENT is:
.
The PRINCIPLE is:
In this case:
The relevant PRECEDENT is:
THEREFORE: (5 marks)
(name of student who completed this question)
马克拥有一些农地外面城市。 他对销售感兴趣那土地, 因此他告诉第一个买主，吉姆, 以便那州要建立在会直接地去的城市周围的一条道路经过这土地, 使它变成更有价值。告诉吉姆的马克他想要把握在对土地之上直到道路是建造, 但是他需要的钱强烈地。 基于马克的陈述，吉姆以每英亩澳币$2,000 买了土地。 作为农地, 它是价值只有每英亩澳币$1,000, 但是与一条新的道路, 它会是价值每英亩澳币$5,000。 马克为一条新的道路知道没有计划而且当吉姆这学习，他控告墨菲的时候。 讨论吉姆是否有为酬劳控告马克的任何理由。
元素是:
。
原则是:
在这情况:
有关的先例是:
因此: (5个标志)
(完成的学生的名字这疑问)