大师帮忙翻译一下吧！！

来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/05/17 07:55:17
Self(1994)argues against public choice ideas on empirical grounds. He argues that the notion that governments that minimize their responsibilities will therefore be more impartial between groups and interests is quite wrong. He cites the case of nineteenth-century governments, which although small in scope were strongly biased towards the interests of property and capital. any reading of history teaches us that it took the growth of more balanced political forces to improve the appalling conditions of indrstrial workers and peasants. Arguing even more strenuously, Stretton and Orchard state that " after twenty years or so of empirical research none of the original and distinctive elements of public choice can said to be proven." It is therefore indeed ironic, as Boston notes, that the intellectual ascendancy of this theory comes at a time when its explanatory power is declining.

Self(1994)argues 反对公开挑选想法在经验主义的地面。他争辩说, 政府使他们的责任减到最小将是因此公平的在小组和兴趣之间的概念是相当错误的。他援引十九世纪政府事例, 虽然小在范围是强烈偏心的往物产的兴趣并且资本历史任一读书教我们它采取更加平衡的政治力量成长改进indrstrial 工作者和农民的骇人条件。争论更加吃力地, Stretton 和果树园声明那" 在二十年以后或如此经验主义的研究无公开选择罐头的原始和特别元素认为是proven." 它是因此的确反语的, 当波士顿笔记, 这种理论智力优势来当它的说明力量下降时候。