各位英语高手请进!急急急呀~~十万火急啦!
来源:百度知道 编辑:UC知道 时间:2024/05/05 19:45:51
请各位高手帮小弟翻译下面这段文字好吗?谢谢!
The capitalist countries,the separation of powers and the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie are symbols of the political systems , but the forms in each of the countries differ.Bills can be proposed from members of the Congress and may be passed in the USA , but in practice only the members of the stronger party in the Gouse of Commons are real law-makers.There is no Minister of Justice in the British government and there is no criminal code and no civil code, either. In deciding whether the accused is guilty or innocent , there must be the presence of the jury in both the British and American courts.
The capitalist countries,the separation of powers and the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie are symbols of the political systems , but the forms in each of the countries differ.Bills can be proposed from members of the Congress and may be passed in the USA , but in practice only the members of the stronger party in the Gouse of Commons are real law-makers.There is no Minister of Justice in the British government and there is no criminal code and no civil code, either. In deciding whether the accused is guilty or innocent , there must be the presence of the jury in both the British and American courts.
发达资本主义国家,三权分立与专政是资产阶级政治制度的象征,但该形式在每个国家是不一样的.由国会议员都可以提交议案,并可能在美国通过。但在实际中,只有成员对占优势的政党,即下议院,才视真正的制定法律者。英国政府没有司法部长,也没有刑法,没有民法。在英国合美国法院决定被告是否有罪或无辜,必须有陪审团在场。
发达资本主义国家,三权分立与专政,资产阶级的象征,政治制度,但该形式在每个国家可以提议由国会议员,并可能通过在美国,但在实践中,只有成员对增强党在共享,是真正的法律没有司法部长,在英国政府并没有刑法,没有民法所不容。在决定被告是否有罪或无辜,必须有陪审团在场的无论是英国和美国法院。
资本主义国家,政权的分离和资产阶级的独裁是它政治体系的代表,但是资本主义的形式在各个国家是不同的.在美国,法案可以由国会的成员提出并且可能被通过,但是在实践上只有下议院Gouse属于更强大的党派的成员才是真正的法律制定者.英国政府没有司法部长,而且也没有刑事法典和公民法典.在美国和英国法院,判决上,无论被告有罪或是清白,都一定有陪审团出席.