哪个好心人帮我翻译下

Ropp’s important argument emerges clearly ,especially in the last two chapters ,where he seems to be more comfortable with a speculative and analytic mode.It is that the “dissent” of the novel ----for all its newness of form ---is a farmiliar kind ,with rich precedents in the perennial dissent of philosophic Taoism ,in the ancient bureaucratic tactic of withdrawal and “self cultivation”and in the much closer sixteenth and seventeenth-century patterns of political protest ,individualism ,and egalitarianism .Addressing recent Chinese Marxist evaluations of The Scholars ,Ropp argues that Wu Ching-tzu was perhaps a “feudal subversive”
But hardly a “feudal reformer”and that Wu’s ultimate response to the foibles ,corruption ,and “conservative academicism ” around him was neither despair nor activism ,but rather pessimistic resignation ,passivity ,and change in personal attitude.

哪个好心人帮我翻译下啊? 哪个好心人帮我翻译下 好心人帮我翻译下 帮我翻译下。。好心人。。 谁来帮我翻译下啊，我有点看不懂额，哪个好心人来帮我看下。 哪个好心人能帮我翻译一下??????????? 哪个好心人帮我翻译一下地址~~~~~~~ 哪个好心人帮我翻译一下! 哪个好心人帮我翻译一段话 哪个好心人帮我翻译一下啊？！