请高手帮我翻译成现在文急用啊谢谢哦

来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/05/27 10:54:16
胡氏辨“五行”，有“论五行之序”、“论《洪范》五行传生成之数”、“论古九宫之数”、论《乾凿度》太一九宫之数”等结论。说“《易》有四象,而无五行,与天地之数决无交涉”、“或以此为河图，或以此为洛书,谬种流传,变怪百出。原其弊,实《汉志》有以启之”、“后世以九宫为河图，实造端于明堂月令之说”、“九宫非河图也。自《乾凿度》有河图八文之语、刘瑜有河图九房之称，而世遂以九宫为河图矣。又有指此为洛书者,盖以九畴之故。然九畴有次第无方位也，强配八卦以附会之数，岂理也哉！”,此亦持之有据,言之成理。
胡氏辨“先天太极”，立“论希夷先天图”之论。将赵撝谦《六书本义》所列“天地自然河图”称之为“太极真图”，曰“康节之学实出于希夷,其所演以为先天古易者,悉本此图”,又谓此图蔡元定所得三图之中，“此居其一,名曰先天图,亦曰太极图,取《参同契》之月体纳甲二用三五与九宫八卦混而一之者也”此辨有所不明,大有商量。宋濂既谓新安罗愿“作阴阳相含之象.就其中八分之以为八卦，谓之河图”，则赵氏所称“天地自然河图”，即有所本,而“古太极图”之名,乃章潢所定（见《图书编》）。又邵雍《先天图》乃方圆六十四卦合一之图,并非阴阳相含“黑白鱼”形图。至谓此图是蔡元定入蜀所得三图之一，而朱熹不得见,则明季本已辨之在先,曰：“朱子与蔡氏,无书不讲明,岂有秘不与言之理？”（见《易学四同》）又胡氏推断此图原本“月体纳甲二用三五与九宫八卦混而一之者”，并以“黑眼”为离卦中爻,“白眼”为坎卦中爻。此则是不明此图来源之误。张惠言《易图条辨》曰：“此图元初出于建安,明人盛传之。其托于蔡季通,非有证据……为此图者，盖由朱子发《纳甲之图》，用周元公太极之法,环而入之。”此图实由《汉上易传卦图》中之《纳甲图》(或杨甲《六经图》中之《伏羲八卦图》)演变而来,其“黑眼”乃坎卦上爻，“白眼”乃离卦上爻。
胡氏辨“龙图”，针对《宋文鉴》所录《易龙图序》曰：“今观其序之荒谬,则有不可胜言者……此书之伪妄，灼然可观矣。”此辨有见，朱熹早就指出“《龙图》是伪书”。张理《易象图说》不辨《易龙图序》之伪，据之推出十数“河图”与九数“洛书”。依雷思齐《易图通变》有幸得见《龙图》一书之说，“于本图之外,就以五十有五之数别出一图，自标之以为形洛书者”,则知《龙图》一书并不以十数为“河图”，而张理所推亦不是所谓“希夷之本图”。(郑樵《通志

Hu identified "five elements", "On the elements of the sequence", "On" Hongfan "Element-generated," "On the number of Jiugong", "stem cutting of" too few January 9 Gong "conclusions. "" easy "four images, without the five elements, and the number is no heaven and earth representations", "or as a river map, or as a Luo of the absurdity spread to variable strange 100. Jibi original is the "Han-chi" to Kai "," to save succeeding generations Jiugong plans for the river, it Caoduan in Mingtang, Order, "and" non-Jiugong also plans River. Since the "dry cutting of the" River Chart 8 text of the language, Liu Yu River is called the Figure 9, and the World Suisijiugong矣plans for the river. Luo also refers to this book, to cover the domain of the company. However, no order of the domains have also bearings, gossip with a strong will of the few, not justifications a