请高手翻译（奖）

来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/05/30 07:25:16
Recent studies find that environmental tax swaps typically exacerbate the costs of the tax system and therefore do not produce a “double dividend”. We extend previous models by incorporating tax favored consumption goods (e.g. housing, medical care). In this setting, the efficiency gains from recycling environmental tax revenues are larger because pre-existing taxes distort the consumption bundle, besides distorting factor markets. We find that a revenue-neutral emissions tax (or auctioned permits) can produce a significant double dividend¾ indeed the economic costs of modest emissions reductions may be negative. The efficiency gains from emissions taxes over grandfathered permits are also larger than previously recognized.

最近的研究发现，环境税的掉期交易通常加剧的费用税制，因此没有产生“双重红利” 。我们以往的型号，纳入税的最惠国待遇，消费品（如住房，医疗） 。在这一背景下，提高效率，从回收的环保税收收入较大的，因为前现有税项的扭曲的消费束，除了扭曲的生产要素市场。我们发现，收入中立的排放税（或拍卖许可证）能够产生巨大的双重红利¾事实上，经济成本温和的排放量减少可能是否定的。效率收益，从排放量税，超过grandfathered许可证，也比以前更大的承认。