请英语高手给翻译一下 (关于蒂布特模型的)

来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/06/17 16:43:43
The many citations to Tiebout’s work should not be taken as evidence of approval by the academic community. A good fraction of the articles that address the Tiebout-Oates model do so to
find fault with it. Many simply overlook Hamilton’s zoning insight (e.g., Truman Bewley1981) or, if they do not, they rail against its implications for the distribution of wealth (e.g., GaryMiller 1981), even though capitalization moots both intramunicipal and intermunicipal differences in fiscal advantages (Hamilton 1976).
A more insightful group of critics faults the model for not saying anything about the supply
side (Epple & Zelenitz 1981; Vernon Henderson 1985). Who were the local government
managers who supplied the various services for which households migrated to the community?
Tests of the model by Oates and others focus almost entirely on the demand side of the model.
Capitalization of differences in taxes and service levels showed that homebuyers were aware of

许多引文蒂布特的工作，不应被视为证据的批准，由学术团体。一个良好的小部分的文章，解决蒂布特- oates模型，这样做的
找到故障与它。许多企业却根本忽略了汉密尔顿的分区的洞察力（例如，杜鲁门bewley1981 ）或，如果他们不这样做，他们对铁路的影响，财富的分配（例如， garymiller 1981年） ，即使资本moots都intramunicipal和城市间的差异，财政优势（汉密尔顿1976年） 。
一个更精辟的小组批评故障模式，不是说什么供应
方（ epple ＆ zelenitz 1981年;弗农亨德森1985年） 。谁被当地政府
经理谁提供的各项服务，为其中的住户迁移到社会？
试验模型oates和其他重点几乎完全是在需求方面，该模型。
资本化的差异，税收和服务水平，显示购屋者知道
社区之间的分歧。但它说，几乎没有任何有关如何形成的社区和
他们如何运行。有没有政治，没有何俊仁赫尔希曼的（ 1970年）的“声音”在这
模型的入境和出境。

The many citations to Tiebout’s work should not be taken as evidence of approval by the academic community. A good fraction of the articles that address the Tiebout-Oates model do so to
find fault with it. Many simply overlook Hamilton’s zoning insight (e.g., Truman Bewley1981) or, if they do not, they rail against its implications for the distribution of wealth (e.g., GaryMiller 1981), even though capitalization moots both intramunicipal and intermunicipal differences in fiscal advantages (Hamilton 19