帮忙翻译一下。。有一些地方自己不太明白

来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/05/30 20:52:04
The use of the political lens draws attention to the poor management of the performance appraisal process, including lack of rater training, low levels of supervisory motivation for doing a good job and manipulation of the process for personal reasons, with the result that performance appraisal is seen as a non-event, characterized by 'corrosive sloppiness' (Folger and Cropanzano, 1998). This view of the process and its results is similar to that expressed by Longnecker et al., (1996). However, Folger and Cropanzano (1998) suggest that the 'trial' metaphor offers more hope as an approach for understanding performance appraisal in ways that accept the reality of the other metaphors, transcend their limitations and facilitate a better appreciation of the interpersonal dynamics that are central to the process.
In essence, the trial or 'due process' metaphor 'distinguishes between the goals of accuracy and justice in PA and highlights the importance of fai

使用政治透镜引起对成绩评价过程的恶劣的管理的注意，包括缺乏估价人训练，监督刺激的低水平因个人原因做过程的好工作和操作的，与结果成绩评价看作为扫兴的事，描绘为‘腐蚀性泥泞’ (Folger和Cropanzano， 1998)。 过程和它的结果的这个看法类似Longnecker等表达的那， (1996)。 然而， Folger和Cropanzano (1998)建议‘试验’隐喻提供更多希望作为了解的成绩评价一种方法用接受其他隐喻的现实的方式，超越他们的局限并且促进对过程是中央的人际的动力学的更好的欣赏。
实质上，试验或者‘正当手续’隐喻‘区别在准确性的在PA的目标和正义之间并且突出faimess的重要性作为一个合法的PA目标’ (等Folger， 1992)。 进一步，它假设，准确性不保证faimess，
human尊严或个人价值， perfonnance评估应该提供的结果(Folger和Cropanzano 1998)。 如果有护士，正当手续隐喻，同样，认可必然性矛盾的利益，对做法的对应的需要适当对分歧的‘管理’和设法的重要性是公平的： 关于是的表现不确定性正确的(Folger和ai 1992)。

you'd better find a free online-translator site. not a free translator.

if you still have questions, post it here. i'm sure a lot of good people are willing to help.

don't be lazy!