还是短文翻译 谢谢
来源:百度知道 编辑:UC知道 时间:2024/06/20 07:00:00
国际示院将两案的诉讼结合起业,虽然从表面上看两案保持独立,但由于结论相同,所以法院对两案只作出一个单一的判决。1969年2月20日,法院以11票对6票判定,西德没有义务在划分大陆架时接受等距离原则。划界应考虑到一切有关情况,依照公平原则,通过协议来划定,使构成当事国陆地领土海底自然延伸部分的大陆架归其所有。与此同时,法院也未接受西德的论点。
West Germany and Denmark, the Netherlands in the North Sea continental shelf delimitation issue in the dispute. In these countries on December 1, 1964 signed the "Treaty Dutch" in 1965 and six have signed on the 9th "Dedan Treaty." In these two treaties established between the parts of the boundary line, from coast to sea, to 30, 25, the main application of the principle of equidistance draw.But they can not be on these points outside the boundary line to reach any agreement. This is because the Federal Republic of Germany, in customary international law, not the principle of equidistance, but this way of the North Sea continental shelf boundaries of the Federal Republic of Germany is extremely unfair. As the coast of West Germany is concave, and its coastline inward bending much,According to the principle of equidistance of the Continental Shelf it is very negative, can only give it a more narrow area of the continental shelf, seabed area just north of 5 percent