UC知道请各位帮我翻译一下这段英语论文
来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/06/08 05:31:13
2.1.1 Legal recognition and evidential value of data messages
The first question is whether a data message can be treated as a document and whether it be accepted as evidence in courts. In many countries, (both civil law and common law systems), computerised records are generally admissible as evidence. For example, the English courts have recognised other means of passing on information than paper documents. In Derby & Co v. Weldon (No 9) (1991) Vinelott J. held that the database of a computer, in so far as it contained information capable of being retrieved and converted into readable form and whether stored in the computer or record in backup file, is a document for the purposes of the High Court rules governing discovery of documents.
The ‘best evidence rule’ requires presentation of the best available evidence. In the case where there is an original document, a data message may not be accepted as the best evidence and may be considered as hearsay evidence. However,
The first question is whether a data message can be treated as a document and whether it be accepted as evidence in courts. In many countries, (both civil law and common law systems), computerised records are generally admissible as evidence. For example, the English courts have recognised other means of passing on information than paper documents. In Derby & Co v. Weldon (No 9) (1991) Vinelott J. held that the database of a computer, in so far as it contained information capable of being retrieved and converted into readable form and whether stored in the computer or record in backup file, is a document for the purposes of the High Court rules governing discovery of documents.
The ‘best evidence rule’ requires presentation of the best available evidence. In the case where there is an original document, a data message may not be accepted as the best evidence and may be considered as hearsay evidence. However,
2.1.1法律上承认和证据价值的数据电文
第一个问题是是否有数据电文可以视为一个文件，它是否被接纳为证据在法庭上。在许多国家， （包括大陆法系和普通法系统） ，电脑记录，一般接纳为证据。例如，英国法院已认可的其他手段传递信息比纸质文件。在德比郡公司诉韦尔登（ 9号） （ 1991 ） Vinelott学者认为，数据库的计算机，只要它包含的信息能够被回收并转换成可读形式，以及是否存储在计算机或记录备份文件，是一个文件的目的高等法院规则发现的文件。
的最佳证据规则，要求介绍了现有的最佳证据。在那里的原始文件，数据电文不得接受最好的证据，并可能被视为传闻证据。然而，在案件