UC知道英译中，帮帮忙，急
来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/06/17 11:48:04
Animal Welfare vs. Animal Liberation
Jasper and Nelkin (1992) distinguish among animal protectionist groups, welfarists,
pragmatists, and fundamentalists. “In the humane tradition of the ASPCA, animals
welfarists accept most current uses of animals, but seek to minimize their suffering
and pain. They view animals as distinct from humans, but as objects entitled to
compassion” (p. 8). On the other hand, the more fundamentalist groups want
“animal rights” or liberation from oppressive or exploitative uses. I refer here to
this distinction because I want to introduce my own distinction between two ways
of opposing current practices. People (perhaps those Jasper and Nelkin call “pragmatists”)who want to liberate animals from uses that compromise their welfare, but believe that the most effective way of doing this, at least currently, is to join hands
with “welfarists” who want to change current practices so that they are more
humane, I will
Jasper and Nelkin (1992) distinguish among animal protectionist groups, welfarists,
pragmatists, and fundamentalists. “In the humane tradition of the ASPCA, animals
welfarists accept most current uses of animals, but seek to minimize their suffering
and pain. They view animals as distinct from humans, but as objects entitled to
compassion” (p. 8). On the other hand, the more fundamentalist groups want
“animal rights” or liberation from oppressive or exploitative uses. I refer here to
this distinction because I want to introduce my own distinction between two ways
of opposing current practices. People (perhaps those Jasper and Nelkin call “pragmatists”)who want to liberate animals from uses that compromise their welfare, but believe that the most effective way of doing this, at least currently, is to join hands
with “welfarists” who want to change current practices so that they are more
humane, I will
动物福利与动物的解放
贾斯珀、Nelkin(1992)区别动物保护团体,welfarists,
实用主义和原教旨主义者”,载于《人文传统和动物。ASPCA
welfarists接受最新采用的动物,而是寻求减少他们的痛苦
和疼痛。他们认为人类的动物相区别,但作为对象有权
慈悲”(p。8)。另一方面,更原教旨主义团体希望
动物权利”或“压迫或开发与利用。我是来这里
这种区别的,因为我想向你介绍我自己区分两种方法
反对当前的实际。人们(也许Nelkin碧玉,称之为“实用主义”)的人,要把他们从用途,动物福利,但是相信妥协,最有效的方法就是这样做的,至少目前,携手合作
“welfarists“谁想要改变目前做法,使他们更重要
仁慈的、我要称为我的reformists1(或务实的改革派)。这些人
小组分享某个概念的动物福利,并有一定的理想
道德行为是可以接受的,但内容,至少目前,在工作
即使改善条件的改善这一理想。