求翻译(不要软件版)

来源:百度知道 编辑:UC知道 时间:2024/05/28 16:29:22
In one authority, the‘‘audit committee’’ is an Audit Panel comprising wholly of independent consultants that goes beyond the CIPFA1 guidance (2005b, p. 2) that recommends that the Audit Committee membership should in an ideal situation be separate from the scrutiny functions (of the scrutiny committee), as a measure to reinforce independence.
The implementation and establishment of the audit committee has in turn placed the internal audit function and head of internal audit under the spotlight in relation to the expectations from the audit committee and the governing body as a whole. The reason for this is attributable to a certain extent by the vast amount of literature and guidelines on the role and responsibilities attached to their counterpart the private sector audit committee. Based on the results obtained from a questionnaire designed to survey the views of Heads of Internal Audit, this article considers the issues affecting the working relationship between the audit com

在一个权力机构, 这是“审计委员会”是一个审计小组,包括完全的独立顾问超出CIPFA1指导( 2005b ,第2页) ,建议在审计委员会成员应当在一个理想的情况分开审议职能(审查委员会) ,作为衡量加强独立性。

执行和建立审计委员会反过来把内部审计职能和领导下的内部审计的焦点是在期望审计委员会和理事会作为一个整体。这样做的原因是由于在一定程度上通过大量的文献和指导方针的作用和责任的对应重视私营部门的审计委员会。根据取得的成果,从设计的调查问卷的意见元首内部审计,本文认为,问题的影响之间的工作关系,审计委员会和内部审计职能(所认为的受访者) 。这是一个机会,看是否符合国家的发挥的理论预期和假设,审计委员会和内部审计的基石公司治理。