感激啊帮忙翻译下

来源:百度知道 编辑:UC知道 时间:2024/06/05 19:00:55
// output if num_tries == 2 and
// we had forgotten the break statements
Hmm. Sorry. Wrong again.
Ah, this is harder than it looks, isn't it?
It must be getting pretty frustrating by now!
IAfter a case label is matched, all the case labels following the
matched case label are also executed unless we explicitly break off
execution. This is what the break statement does. Why, you're probably asking,
is the switch statement designed this way? Here is an example of this
fall-through behavior being just right:

//输出如果num_tries == 2 和
//我们忘记了断裂声明
Hmm. 抱歉。错误再。
安培小时, 这比它看, isn't 它坚硬的?
它一定得到现在相当挫败!
案件标签被匹配的IAfter, 所有案件标记随后而来
被匹配的案件标签并且被执行除非我们明确地终止
施行。这是什么断裂声明。为什么, you're 大概要求,
开关声明是被设计这样吗? 这这的例子
下落通过行为是公正正确的: