UC知道跪求奈达的“翻译理论”的中文版 急！急！急！
来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/06/20 05:52:37
本人现在做论文需要翻译三千字的著作．现在找到一篇奈达博士写的关于翻译理论的文章．希望能找到对应的中文．在此本菜鸟先谢谢各位啦～
下面附上文章的开始部分：Theories of Translation
As yet there is no theory of translation and in the technical sense of “a coherent set of general propositions used as principles to explain a class of phenomena,” but there are quite a few “theories” in the broad sense of “a set of principles which are helpful in understanding the nature of translating or in establishing criteria for evaluating a translated text.” In general ,however ,these principles are stated in terms of how to produce an acceptable translation.
The lack of a fully acceptable theory of translation should not come as surprise, since translating is essentially a very complex phenomenon ,and insight concerning this interlingual activity are derived from a number of differ disciplines, e.g. linguistics, psychology, sociology, cultural anthropology, communication theory, literary criticism ,aesthetics, and semiotics. The fact that there is no generall
下面附上文章的开始部分：Theories of Translation
As yet there is no theory of translation and in the technical sense of “a coherent set of general propositions used as principles to explain a class of phenomena,” but there are quite a few “theories” in the broad sense of “a set of principles which are helpful in understanding the nature of translating or in establishing criteria for evaluating a translated text.” In general ,however ,these principles are stated in terms of how to produce an acceptable translation.
The lack of a fully acceptable theory of translation should not come as surprise, since translating is essentially a very complex phenomenon ,and insight concerning this interlingual activity are derived from a number of differ disciplines, e.g. linguistics, psychology, sociology, cultural anthropology, communication theory, literary criticism ,aesthetics, and semiotics. The fact that there is no generall
中文:
还没有翻译理论和技术的意识"一套完整的一般性命题 作为一类现象的解释原则",但其中也不乏"理论"的广义 "一套原则,有助于理解性翻译或建立考核标准 一译文. "不过,总的来说,这些原则是在可接受的条件下,如何产生. 缺少一个完全可以接受的翻译理论,应该不会令人感到惊讶, 由于翻译是一个非常复杂的现象,有识之士对此际活动是从一批 不同学科,例如 语言学、心理学、社会学、文化人类学、传播理论、文学批评、美学、符号. 事实上,没有任何一个公认的理论之一,这对任何违纪行为应当 要充分认识到,人之所以基本上没有什么不足,因为那些翻译 透过翻译解释不了综合理论正是他们是怎么做的. 各套原则或规则如何能帮忙翻译讨论的历史发展, 下篇-hornby(1998)却十分有效, 也可以讨论,在某些学科的基本见解,其中有多方面解释 翻译和解释. 制定翻译理论,但涉及的主要是西方世界,虽然中国人理想的翻译,即忠实、 光滑、高雅,但没有任何人来左右结论的相对重要性原则. 在中世纪翻译了大量发生在阿拉伯世界巴格达托莱多 被聘用的原则,但并没有重大影响当今世界社会实践的翻译.
不太通顺,凑合吧