UC知道英语翻译 不难
来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/05/10 23:00:35
Good assessment is valid.
Validity is a concept that needs to be fully understood. Like reliability, there are technical terms and issues associated with validity that are essential in helping teachers and administrators make reasonable and appropriate inferences from assessment results (e.g., types of validity evidence, validity generalization, construct underrepresentation, construct-irrelevant variance, and discriminant and convergent evidence). Of critical importance is the concept of evidence based on consequences, a new major validity category in the recently revised Standards. Both intended and unintended consequences of assessment need to be examined with appropriate evidence that supports particular arguments or points of view. Of equal importance is getting teachers and administrators to understand their role in gathering and interpreting validity evidence.
Validity is a concept that needs to be fully understood. Like reliability, there are technical terms and issues associated with validity that are essential in helping teachers and administrators make reasonable and appropriate inferences from assessment results (e.g., types of validity evidence, validity generalization, construct underrepresentation, construct-irrelevant variance, and discriminant and convergent evidence). Of critical importance is the concept of evidence based on consequences, a new major validity category in the recently revised Standards. Both intended and unintended consequences of assessment need to be examined with appropriate evidence that supports particular arguments or points of view. Of equal importance is getting teachers and administrators to understand their role in gathering and interpreting validity evidence.
好评估是合法的。 有效性是需要充分地被了解的概念。 象可靠性，有技术术语，并且是根本的在帮助的老师和管理员的问题与有效性相关由评估做合理和适当的推断发生(即，有效性证据、有效性概念化、修建代表名额不足、修建毫不相关的变化和有识别力和会聚证据的类型)。重要重要是根据后果的证据的概念，一个新的主要有效性类别在最近修改过的标准。 评估的意欲的和不愿意的后果需要审查以支持特殊论据或观点的适当的证据。相等的重要老师和管理员了解他们的在收集和解释有效性证据的角色。