我想请教法律专业的高人帮翻译一下, 原文如下

来源:百度知道 编辑:UC知道 时间:2024/05/02 10:05:25
但是,很快富有戏剧性的一幕上演了。2004年4月23日,双环负责人称:双环才是侵权事件的原告。早在本田起诉双环之前,双环已于去年10月16日,向石家庄市中级人民法院提出“请求确认不侵犯专利权”的诉讼请求,市中院已经受理此案,并于次日将诉讼文书送达本田公司。双环副总经理马凯称:双环已经就此事向北京市高院提出“管辖异议”,但至今没有得到回复。马凯认为,本田民事侵权在先,又向北京市高院申请立案,程序违法在后。双环无错,错在本田。
天天中考
Thanks for your prompt reply.

However, soon dramatic scene repeated. April 23, 2004, Shuanghuan Condemns : Shuanghuan violations is the plaintiff. Honda early in the prosecution Shuanghuan, Shuanghuan last October 16, to the Shijiazhuang Municipal Intermediate People's Court for "not asking for the confirmation of the patent infringement" of the claim, City Intermediate People's Court has accepted the case, and the next day the forum will serve Honda. Shuanghuan vice president said Ma Kai : Shuanghuan have on the matter to the Beijing Higher People's Court "jurisdictional objection," But so far not received a reply. Ma Kai, Honda tort earlier, also in Beijing High Court for the file after the procedure illegal. Shuanghuan no wrong in the Honda.