请求翻译下面的文字

来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/06/05 18:22:56
The theme of “evil” has been very little dealt with in psychoanalysis because of a (justified) wariness of using terms whose provenance is theology, terms which lend themselves to the reification and hypostatization of their designaturm (e.g., seeing evil as a power in nature, Satan, or the devil). Most of us, I believe, would not see “evil” as existing in itself, but rather as a process that has incipient beginnings converging from many sources and is most often gradual, and that in addition requires a close, objectified, judgment about the meaning of a human act. “Evil” may sound too allegorical or too concrete, too essentialist or too objective for psychoanalytic ways of thinking that are oriented toward the study of individual subjectivity.

“罪恶”题材很少应付了在精神分析由于使用起源是神学，期限借自己到他们的designaturm的具体化和使实体化的用语a (有正当理由)谨慎性(即，看罪恶作为力量本质上、Satan或者恶魔)。大多数我们，我本身相信，不会看“罪恶”一样现有，但宁可象另外有起初起点聚合从许多来源并且是经常逐渐的，并且要求关闭， objectified，评断关于一次人的行动的意思的过程。“罪恶”也许听起来太寓言或太混凝土，太essentialist或宗旨为精神分析的思维方式那太被安置往单独主观的研究。

主题为"邪恶" ,已经很少处理psychoanalysis因为一(理)警惕利用职权 其出处是神学上的名词本身的物化和hypostatization其designaturm (例如, 看到邪恶视为一种权力的性质,撒旦或魔鬼) . 大多数人,我相信他是看不到"邪恶"的存在本身, 而是作为一个过程,已开始出现趋近于许多来源,通常是渐进式的, 并指出,除了需要密切, objectified ,判断什么是一个人的行为. "邪恶"听起来太allegorical或太具体, 太essentialist或过目的psychoanalytic思维方式是面向研究的个人主体