UC知道谁可以帮我翻译下有语音识别的一个外文文章?(3)
来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/05/31 05:33:44
4. The study
4.1. Research questions
Our study examined three issues related to the
successful adoption of SR for business applications.
1. How accurate is text generated through SR as
compared to typing Prior studies have indicated SR accuracies up to
99%, but no tests have compared the accuracy of
subjects using SR and the keyboard to generate the
same text. Although most college-age students (our
subject using SR to be less accurate than subjects using the
keyboard.
*H1.Subjects using SR are less accurate than subjects
using a keyboard.
2. How fast can text be generated through SR as
compared to typing?
A student typist may be able to type 13–41 wpm,
a good typist may type from 61 to 90 wpm, and an
excellent typist may type from 85 to 112 wpm,
assuming five characters per word[8]. But people
*speak much faster than they type [32,34]. When
limited by the necessity to generate fre
4.1. Research questions
Our study examined three issues related to the
successful adoption of SR for business applications.
1. How accurate is text generated through SR as
compared to typing Prior studies have indicated SR accuracies up to
99%, but no tests have compared the accuracy of
subjects using SR and the keyboard to generate the
same text. Although most college-age students (our
subject using SR to be less accurate than subjects using the
keyboard.
*H1.Subjects using SR are less accurate than subjects
using a keyboard.
2. How fast can text be generated through SR as
compared to typing?
A student typist may be able to type 13–41 wpm,
a good typist may type from 61 to 90 wpm, and an
excellent typist may type from 85 to 112 wpm,
assuming five characters per word[8]. But people
*speak much faster than they type [32,34]. When
limited by the necessity to generate fre
大意应该是：
4. 研究
4.1. 研究问题
我们的研究审查了三个问题与有关
SR 的成功的收养为商业应用。
1. 多么准确的是文本引起通过SR
与键入比较预先的研究表明了SR 准确性
99%, 但测试未比较准确性
主题使用SR 和键盘引起
同样文本。虽然多数学院年龄学生(我们
主题使用SR 较不准确的比主题使用
键盘。
* H1.Subjects 使用SR 比主题较不准确的
使用键盘。
2. 多么罐头文本快速地引起通过SR
与键入比较?
学生打字员也许能对型13–41 wpm,
一位好打字员也许键入从61 到90 wpm, 和
优秀打字员也许键入从85 到112 wpm,
假设 five 字符每word[8 ] 。但人们
* 比他们键入快速地讲话[ 32,34 ] 。当
由必要限制引起自由形式
评论用会话英语, 人typi-
* cally 讲话在大约100–150 wpm [ 18 ] 。一秒钟
study[20]found 那一位报告人以正常讲话
率导致大约150 wpm, 但最大值
讲话率可能是尽量637 wpm[11 ] 。因而,
我们盼望主题使用SR 能
比主题快速地引起文本使用键盘。
* H2.Subjects 使用SR 引起更多文本比潜水艇
jects 使用键盘。
3. 什么样的用户将采取语音识别
技术?
某些人民也许不使用计算机因为
键盘失望或无能对下
站立接口。我们期待用户与较少
键盘经验会认为, SR 更加容易
使用和更多efficient 。
* H3.Subjects 以粗劣的键入的技能考虑SR
更加容易使用和高效率比主题与
好键入的技能。
4.2. 方法
我们进行了一系