UC知道请帮忙翻译一下下面这段话.
来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/05/15 00:28:43
The preceding discussion indicates that the Fair Labor Standards
Act is to be questioned as to both administrative feasibility and economic policy.
It indicates, too, that the interpretation of the federal interstate commerce power made under the act is the broadest ever attempted under non-emergency legislation.
The problems of "coverage" are complicated almost beyond
description; and the difficult nature of the questions facing the economic laymen on the industry committees renders doubtful the soundness of their wage recommendations. The question is raised as to how a hundred or more industry committees, work-
ing under pressure and with relatively little technical training,can be expected to vote the correct answers to price problems which have been for years and are at present taxing trained economists.(Study of reasons advanced by the reporting committees in support of their recommendations reveals that they are filled with re
Act is to be questioned as to both administrative feasibility and economic policy.
It indicates, too, that the interpretation of the federal interstate commerce power made under the act is the broadest ever attempted under non-emergency legislation.
The problems of "coverage" are complicated almost beyond
description; and the difficult nature of the questions facing the economic laymen on the industry committees renders doubtful the soundness of their wage recommendations. The question is raised as to how a hundred or more industry committees, work-
ing under pressure and with relatively little technical training,can be expected to vote the correct answers to price problems which have been for years and are at present taxing trained economists.(Study of reasons advanced by the reporting committees in support of their recommendations reveals that they are filled with re
前述的讨论指出公平的劳动标准
“行为”被管理的可行性和经济的政策双方面控制。
它也指出, 对在“行为”之下的联邦州际的商业力量的解释是在非紧急的立法之下尝试中最宽泛的一个。
“报导”的问题比实际描述复杂得多；
而且困难的是，面对经济非专业人士的行会交纳的薪水报告也是可疑的。
问题被提升到如何使一百家或者更多的在高压下工作、没有高科技背景的行会，那对定价问题进行正确的投票——这需要已经完成长达数年的训练的经济学者。
（这项由报告委员会支持和推动的研究，透露出其中充满了内定和限制。而唯一真正确定的行动只有在对最终推荐工薪的头投票中才能展开。）
前面的讨论表明，公平劳动标准
行为是被讯问时，以这两个行政上的可行性和经济政策。
它表明，也就是释法的联邦州际商业的权力，根据该法，是最广泛的尝试下，非紧急立法。
问题的"保障范围" ，是复杂的，几乎超出了
描述和困难性的问题，所面临的经济是外行对业委员会，使可疑的健全其工资的建议。问题是，提出了如何有百多个工业委员会，工作
荷兰在压力作用下，与相对较少的技术培训，可以预料，投票正确答案，以价格问题，这已经多年，目前正在征税训练有素的经济学家。 （讲学习的理由，由委员会的报告支持他们的建议显示他们充满了保留和资历，并说，只有真正明确所采取的行动是要发现在最后的投票推荐的工资） 。