请帮我翻一下这两小段话~
来源:百度知道 编辑:UC知道 时间:2024/06/25 00:29:22
从法律上讲,选择权利只在于当事人本身,而不能属于医生,亲人或其他,医生只具有病情判断权或判断病情的结论的权利,选择安乐死的权利只能属于公民本人.
The " voluntarily namely mercy killing will" raises an example, being critically ill for it, this must with patient consciousness clarity can do the decision for premise;Another a then the before the event expresses.But the " not and voluntarily mercy killing" is a " not intentional wish mercy killing" that the party concerned did not mean or can't mean the will;An is to breach the party concerned will mercy killing.But sometimes not intentional wish mercy killing not necessarily is to breach the patient will, some times patient can't make the judgment.( for example collapsed and fainted, stupid, have no brain child)
Speak from the law, choose the right to consist in the party concerned oneself only, but can't belong to the doctor, close relatives or other, the doctor has the condition judgment power or judges the right of the conclusion of the condition only, choosing the happy and dead right can belong to the citizen oneself.