帮我翻译~~悬赏20分~~非常着急,在线恭候!

来源:百度知道 编辑:UC知道 时间:2024/06/07 14:34:31
We also investigated whether participants who
shared a dominant perspective with the teacher
under observation would rate them as more
effective than when their dominant perspectives
were mis-matched. Following the TPI workshop
and the second viewing of the scenarios participants
were invited to speculate on the perceived dominant
perspective of each scenario’s teacher. Since we
knew the dominant perspective of each of the
participants we could therefore separate the participants
into two groups, (1) those that shared a
perceived dominant perspective (e.g. participant’s
dominant perspective was Apprenticeship and
Teacher was perceived to be Apprenticeship) and
(2) those who did not (e.g. participant’s dominant
perspective was Nurturing and Teacher was perceived
to be Transmission). We found a pattern
congruent with the data reported above; where
participants who did not share a perceived perspecti

我们还调查是否参加谁
共享的主要观点与教师
根据观测将率为更多
有效比其主要观点
被误匹配。继外包研讨会
第二次观看的情景参与者
被邀请猜测知觉优势
观点每个情景的老师。由于我们
占主导地位的观点知道每个
与会者我们因此可以单独参加
分为两组, ( 1 )那些共享了
占主导地位的观点认为(如参与者的
占主导地位的观点是学徒和
教师被视为学徒)和
( 2 )这些谁没有(如参与者的优势
观点培养和教师被认为是
被传输) 。我们发现一种模式
符合上述报告的数据;在
与会者谁不同意感知角度来看,
对平衡的有效性评价那些
教师低于与会者谁没有共享
感知角度(表3 B组) 。并在''
不同意''组12个国家的26名参与者评价
的有效性总的来说是有效的或更低
(包括2不能有效评级)相比,
没有共享的'' ''组在没有收视率
分配不到总的来说是有效的, 4人
高度或特殊情况下有效。再次,一致
与相似的数据,有一个微妙的职位外包
车间转向更积极的评级从
''不同意''集团和没有明显的变化
没有共享的'' ''组。