高手帮忙翻译一段话（医药类），在线急等！！！！！

来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/06/18 10:27:59
But "the FDA stood against [implicit pre-emption] until this administration," O'Reilly said. "The FDA made an historic shift when it argued for implicit pre-emption at the end of 2002. The capture of the FDA by forces favoring judicial pre-emption is a travesty." The FDA has intervened in a handful of lawsuits on the side of drug and medical device manufacturers, arguing that the public health will suffer if state courts are allowed to, in its words, "second-guess" the agency's regulatory decisions by ruling on consumers' tort claims. Ironically, the FDA has taken that position in the face of a rising tide of criticism over its handling of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) -a class of anti-depressants that includes Paxil and Zoloft- and amid calls for the release of unpublished safety and efficacy data so that private researchers can more effectively second-guess the agency

但\"the 粮食与药物管理局站立了反对[ 含蓄先买] 直到这管理, \" O\'Reilly 说。\"The 粮食与药物管理局做了一个历史的转移当它为赞成含蓄先买而辩论在后期的2002 年。粮食与药物管理局的捕获由力量倾向司法先买是travesty 。\ " 粮食与药物管理局干预了在几个诉讼在药物的边并且医疗设备制造商, 争辩说, 公共卫生将遭受如果状态法院被允许对, 在它的词, \"second 猜测\" agency\ 的管理决定由统治在消费者\ ' 侵权行为要求。讽刺地, 粮食与药物管理局采取了那个位置在批评面前上升的浪潮它处理有选择性的5-羟色胺reuptake 抗化剂(SSRIs) - 包括Paxil 并且Zoloft- 和在呼叫之中请求未出版的安全和效力数据发行抗抑郁剂的组以便私有研究员更加有效地装于罐中猜疑代办处

But "the FDA stood against [implicit pre-emption] until this administration," O'Reilly said. "The FDA made an historic shift when it argued for implicit pre-emption at the end of 2002. The capture of the FDA by forces favoring judicial pre-emption is a travesty." The FDA has intervened in a handful of lawsuits on the side of drug and medical device manufacturers, arguing that the public health will suffer if state courts are allowed to, in its words, "second-guess" the agency's regulatory decisions by ru