UC知道各位达人～帮忙翻译，不要软件翻的～
来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/05/27 09:31:53
Figure1 shows a typical hierarchy for a fire risk ranking model that illustrates these terms.In practise, each level in the hierachy consists of a collection of elements,judgements about which must be obtained at the local level in relation each element in the level immediately above it.This will enable the decision-maker to make an overall assessment.These judgement must be consistent if the final conclution is to have any validity.
In this paper, we consider three different approaches to the problem: the Edinburgh approach, devised by Marchant for an FSE study in the hospital; the hierarchical cross impact analysis(HCIA) modification of Edinburgh approach,developed at the Unversity of Ulster in the FSE context;and the analytic hierachy process(AHP) of saaty.
The cross impact methodolgies use input chosen on a Likert scale.The additive value theory which can therefor be applied appeals considerable to the intuitionist.
In this paper, we consider three different approaches to the problem: the Edinburgh approach, devised by Marchant for an FSE study in the hospital; the hierarchical cross impact analysis(HCIA) modification of Edinburgh approach,developed at the Unversity of Ulster in the FSE context;and the analytic hierachy process(AHP) of saaty.
The cross impact methodolgies use input chosen on a Likert scale.The additive value theory which can therefor be applied appeals considerable to the intuitionist.
figure1显示典型的等级为火险等级模型显示了这些terms.in执业; 每一个层次包括一个收集的元素,判断必须取得在地方一级在每个单元的水平,立即以上监理将使决策者作出总体判断assessment.these 必须是一致的,如果最后的结论是没有任何效力. 在这篇文章中,我们考虑三种不同的方法来解决这个问题:爱丁堡办法 制定marchant一个侧面进行研究,在医院里; 等级交叉影响分析( hcia )修改爱丁堡办法,发达国家在unversity沃尔斯特在FSE的背景; 与解析 法( AHP ) saaty . 交叉影响methodolgies投入使用选定一个克特scale.the附加价值理论,可用therefor适用上诉 相当多的直觉.