UC知道哪位大哥大姐帮忙翻译成中文，万分感谢：
来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/05/04 04:15:00
According to literature, one of the basic issues for an appropriate ISM is the so-called “Closed Loop Principle”[Bemelmans, 2000]. That principle is based on the following: developing, using and maintaining IS will only be successful in case the stakeholders involved have (direct) incentives to do their ISM tasks in an appropriate way. In case (positive or negative) incentives are missing, one may expect that
stakeholders will not be really committed to their ISM tasks with the consequence that the information
system will deteriorate over time and will become useless. In other words:
stakeholders should have “benefits” (positive or negative incentives) from being involved in ISM. Accordingly, the “Closed Loop” with its entities, as well as the relationships between the entities, can be depicted in Figure 8.1
stakeholders will not be really committed to their ISM tasks with the consequence that the information
system will deteriorate over time and will become useless. In other words:
stakeholders should have “benefits” (positive or negative incentives) from being involved in ISM. Accordingly, the “Closed Loop” with its entities, as well as the relationships between the entities, can be depicted in Figure 8.1
根据文学，其中一个适当的主义的基本问题是所谓的“Closed圈Principle” [Bemelmans 2000年]。 那项原则根据以下： 开发，使用和维护是只将是成功的，万一赌金保管人介入有(指挥)做的刺激他们的主义任务用一个适当的方式。 万一(正面或消极)刺激是缺掉的，一个人也许期待那
stakeholders真正地不会做到他们的与信息的后果的主义任务
system将随着时间的推移恶化和变得无用。 换句话说：
stakeholders在主义应该有“benefits” (正面或消极刺激)从介入。 相应地， “Closed Loop”以它的个体，以及个体之间的关系，在表8.1可以被描述