帮忙将一段中文翻译成英文

来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/05/30 18:05:00
在对比分析“以人为中心”的设计思想和“以活动为中心”的设计思想的利弊后，得出结论――“以活动为中心”的设计思想更能满足广大人群的需求；同时其并不像“以人为中心”的设计思想一般很容易被时间所淘汰。故而在“以活动为中心”的设计思想指导下，设计出多款代步工具。希望能通过其解决当前代步工具的匮乏以及越来越跟不上人们对交通工具多方面要求的问题。其一，主要解决的是市区人口密集，交通拥堵的问题。充分利用空间，架设形如“天桥”的交通工具；其二，着眼于解决污染，利用细菌将垃圾转化为代步工具的动力，同时利用国外新款代步工具segway技术，将重力转为部分动力，从而节省能源；其三，飞机因其速度的优势为人们称道时，也因受气候问题而另人徒呼奈何。高速列车虽在速度上处于劣势，而运行的稳定性则不失为人们的另一种选择。跨洋海底列车可为人们提供一种很好而稳定的出行选择。

Comparative analysis of the "human-centered" design ideas and "activity-centric" design thinking of the pros and cons, and come to the conclusion - "activity-centric" design thinking better meet the needs of the broad masses of people at the same time and it unlike the "people-centered," the general design concept can be easily eliminated by the time. Therefore, the "activity-enter" under the guidance of the design idea, the number of users to design tools. Hope that, through its tools to resolve the current lack of means of transport as well as people increasingly unable to keep up with the requirements of the various modes of transport problems. First, the main solution is the urban population density, traffic congestion problem. Make full use of space, building-such as " over-bridge " means of transport; Second, focus on resolving pollution, the use of bacteria will refuse to travel into the power tools, use of foreign t