UC知道高手帮忙翻译下下面的话！谢谢了
来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/06/05 03:01:36
（2）由于丙身上没带钱，售票员最终还是把他赶下车？是否合法？为什么？
（3）售票员是否有权销毁旅客携带的危险品？为什么？
（5）对于赵某的流产，售票员和其运输公司是否应承担责任？
（1）乘车人没买票，售票员不能直接把人赶下车，应先让其补票。
（2）合法。因其享受坐车的权利，就应承担付款买票的义务。
（3）有权。因其携带的危险品已危及所有旅客的安全。
（5）对于赵某的流产，客运公司负责违约损害赔偿。但公司可对其工作人员售票员进行追偿，让其承担部分责任。
（1）、（2）、（3）《合同法》第294条规定；"旅客应当持有效客票乘运。旅客无票乘运、超程乘运、超级乘运或者持失效客票乘运的，应当补交票款，承运人可以按照规定加收票款。旅客不交付票款的，承运人可以拒绝运输。"第297条规定："旅客不得随身携带或者在行李中夹带易燃、易爆、有毒、有腐蚀性，有放射性以及有可能危及运输工具上人身和财产安全的危险物品或者其他违禁物品。
旅客违反前规定的，承运人可以将违禁物品卸下，销毁或者送交有关部门。旅客坚持携带或者夹带违禁物品的，承运人应当拒绝运输。
《合同法》第302条规定："承运人应当对运输过程中旅客的伤亡承担损害赔偿责任，但伤亡是旅客自身健康原因造成的或者承运人证明伤亡是旅客故意，重大过失造成的除外。
(1), who travel A, B, C 3 does not want to buy, whether it is possible to the conductor to get out?
(2), C bodies not because of money, and eventually his ticket to get out? Legal? Why?
(3) the right conductor destruction of dangerous goods carried by passengers? Why?
(5) Zhao for the abortion, the conductor and transportation companies should be held responsible?
(1) does not want to buy car, the conductor can not direct people to get out, should let their replacement ticket.
(2) legal. Because of their enjoyment of the right car, it should assume the obligation to pay the ticket.
(3) the right. Because of their dangerous goods carried by passengers has jeopardize the safety of all.
(5) Zhao for the abortion, passenger transport company in charge of breach of contract damages. However, the company can carry out its staff conductor recovery, to shoulder part of the responsibility.
(1), (2), (3) "Contract Law" 294;