UC知道请大家帮助我详细翻译以下案例,谢谢大家!
来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/05/09 11:57:21
2. Shamrock Hilton Hotel v. Caranas （1972）； pg.
122, briefed 9/12/94
Facts: Wife AA left her purse at the table in the dining room at the Hilton. Upon discovering the purse, the bus boy took it to the cashier according to hotel instructions.Thereafter, the cashier handed the purse over to a man claiming to be the husband BB. The next morning, AA's notified the hotel of the loss and claimed the purse contained $13,000 worth of jewels. AA's filed suit for negligence, and won $11,000 plus interests and costs at the trial court. BB appealed.
Issue: Was there a bailment created by the cashier although she may have had no intention of establishing one？
Holding: Yes. If a commercial enterprise which caters to the public holds "lost-and-found" items as a normal course of business, then they create an implied bailment for any items that they recover on their property which were misplaced by their owners.
Reasoning: The court reasoned that there w
122, briefed 9/12/94
Facts: Wife AA left her purse at the table in the dining room at the Hilton. Upon discovering the purse, the bus boy took it to the cashier according to hotel instructions.Thereafter, the cashier handed the purse over to a man claiming to be the husband BB. The next morning, AA's notified the hotel of the loss and claimed the purse contained $13,000 worth of jewels. AA's filed suit for negligence, and won $11,000 plus interests and costs at the trial court. BB appealed.
Issue: Was there a bailment created by the cashier although she may have had no intention of establishing one？
Holding: Yes. If a commercial enterprise which caters to the public holds "lost-and-found" items as a normal course of business, then they create an implied bailment for any items that they recover on their property which were misplaced by their owners.
Reasoning: The court reasoned that there w
2. 三叶草希尔顿旅馆v。 caranas (1972); 页。
122，简报9/12/94
事实： 妻子AA留下她的钱包在桌在饭厅在Hilton。 在发现钱包，公共汽车男孩采取了它对出纳员根据旅馆指示。尔后，出纳员递了钱包对一个人声称是丈夫B到B。 第二天早晨，被通报损失的旅馆和被要求钱包的AA'S包含了$13,000价值珠宝。 AA的提出的诉讼为疏忽和赢取$11,000正兴趣和费用在审判法庭。 呼吁的B到B。
问题： 有没有出纳员创造的委托，虽然她也许有无意建立一？
藏品： 是。 如果迎合公开举行“失物招领处”项目作为一个正常商务课程的商业企业，则他们创造一个含蓄的委托为他们在他们的物产恢复由他们的所有者误置的所有项目。
推理： 法院原因有一个建设性的委托，因为AA，如果她知道她误置了钱包，她合理地将盼望发现者拿着和保护它为她，直到她可能索还它。 进一步，他们说委托是为两个党的相互好处。 旅馆获得回归事务的好处为他们退回失去的物产的那些人。
持异议： 持异议争辩说，委托未被创造，因为没有意图创造委托(坏论据)。 他进一步说，即使有一个委托为钱包和钱包的正常期望的内容，那里是没有委托为珠宝，他怀疑在那里在冠军。