UC知道请大家帮助我翻译一下以下案例,谢谢!!
来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/04/27 18:47:34
122, briefed 9/12/94
Facts: Wife AA left her purse at the table in the dining room at the Hilton. Upon discovering the purse, the bus boy took it to the cashier according to hotel instructions.Thereafter, the cashier handed the purse over to a man claiming to be the husband BB. The next morning, AA's notified the hotel of the loss and claimed the purse contained $13,000 worth of jewels. AA's filed suit for negligence, and won $11,000 plus interests and costs at the trial court. BB appealed.
Issue: Was there a bailment created by the cashier although she may have had no intention of establishing one？
Holding: Yes. If a commercial enterprise which caters to the public holds "lost-and-found" items as a normal course of business, then they create an implied bailment for any items that they recover on their property which were misplaced by their owners.
Reasoning: The court reasoned that there was
1972年希尔顿饭店诉caranasshamrock指引.122、1994年9月12日向事实:机管局妻子离开她的钱包在桌上希尔顿.在发现钱包、公共汽车男孩代为向出纳instructions.thereafter据饭店、出纳把钱包交给了一名自称是丈夫BB型.次日清晨,机管局的通知,声称该酒店的损失13,000元的珠宝包含钱包.机管局的诉讼疏忽,赢得11,000加利息和费用在审判法庭.BB型呼吁.问题:有没有寄托虽然她创造的收银员也许曾无意建立一个持有:不错.如果商业企业迎合市民认为"失去与发现"作为一个正常的业务项目,然后创造一个隐含任何物品,他们寄托在他们的财产被收回被主人错位.推理:法庭有理有建设性寄托因为机管局如果她知道她有错误的钱包,她本来合理预期的持有寻她并保护它,直到她能认领.另外,他们说,是为寄托双方互利.饭店业产生了效益回报那些回失物.异议:异议辩称没有寄托的形成是因为我们无意制造bailmentbad说法.他进一步说,即使有一个寄托的钱包和正常预期目录一个钱包,没有任何寄托的财宝,他怀疑其中有在首位.注:1.在ampco汽车公园有限公司诉威廉斯汽车公园举行商业不是一个受托的内容汽车富康concededly保释,如果没有合理的内容可以发现,例如在主干前钟哥从公元前1000..样品诉减速器、联校舞蹈检查时发现没有一个是受托一块毛皮大衣包裹内清查、因为没有知识的皮毛,因此没有合同公牛-记载在Peet案诉陆士酒店有限公司一个人接受一个拥有一响受托运送到另一个、虽然他不知道戒指是宝贵的.2.于恩诉pressprich,证券商受托成为一个自愿当债券被送到他的办公室错误.他以为这是他一个人的真正主人使者.他被发现不是被改建为合法,因为他正在试图退还给业主,而放弃任何暗示的寄托.他曾试图保护它保留了它的主人然后他会一直被自愿受托绝对保护.