UC知道求助:帮忙翻译下
来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/05/21 18:42:51
According to Article 2.1 of the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement (1994):
a product is considered as being dumped, i.e. introduced into the commerce of another country at less than its normal value, if the export price of the product exported from one country to another is less than the comparable price, in the ordinary course of trade, for the like product when destined for consumption in the exporting country. The WTO members have enacted anti-dumping regulations which are consistent with the Agreement.
As Jackson (1990,p. 2) points out, this type of a definition which basically means that the margin of dumping is obtained by deducting the export sales price from the home market sales price, sounds relatively simple, but is not so when applied. There are a series of well-known reasons for this complexity. The calculation of home market prices, and the adjustments which may be necessary before they can be compared with the export sales price are only some of them. When there are
a product is considered as being dumped, i.e. introduced into the commerce of another country at less than its normal value, if the export price of the product exported from one country to another is less than the comparable price, in the ordinary course of trade, for the like product when destined for consumption in the exporting country. The WTO members have enacted anti-dumping regulations which are consistent with the Agreement.
As Jackson (1990,p. 2) points out, this type of a definition which basically means that the margin of dumping is obtained by deducting the export sales price from the home market sales price, sounds relatively simple, but is not so when applied. There are a series of well-known reasons for this complexity. The calculation of home market prices, and the adjustments which may be necessary before they can be compared with the export sales price are only some of them. When there are
根据刑法第210条的WTO反倾销协定( 1994年) :一产品被视为被弃置, 即引入商业的另一个国家,在低于其正常价值, 如果出口价格的出口产品从一个国家传播到另一个国家是低于可比价格 在正常贸易过程中,对相同的产品,当用于消费的输出国. 世贸组织的成员所颁布的反倾销条例是否符合该协定. 正如杰克逊( 1990年第2号)指出, 这种类型的定义基本上指的倾销幅度,是获得扣除出口销售 价格由本国市场上的销售价格,听起来比较简单,但实际并非如此,当适用. 有一系列众所周知的原因,对这种复杂性. 计算国内市场价格 而调整,可能是必要的,才可以相比的外销价格只有一些 他们. 当有没有销售同类产品的正常贸易过程中在国内市场 输出国或其他某些原因,正常价值可以基于『推定价格' . 销售价格低于每单位(固定和可变)生产成本加上行政和销售费用一般可 视为未在正常贸易过程中, 如果当局断定这种销售款项均在一个较长时期内大幅度quantities.this意味着 技术上'倾销'可以发现,即使是没有国际价格歧视. 出口价格可以建在某些情况. 最常见的理由,这种程序上的可能性,有一个团体或补偿性安排 在出口商和进口商或第三方. 在这种情况下,税额是全部费用之间的进口和转售; 包括所有关税和其他税,此外还有合理的利润. 这样的程序可能造成的风险人造倾销调查结果,如果讲义费或者利润率 高估. 有的倾销调查是不够的征收反倾销税. 受伤的同类产品的国内产业是第二个必要的条件. 为了执行征收反倾销税 受伤必须证明发生了(或有可能是一种威胁) ; 损害必须是'材料' ; 它必须造成的倾销; 并且必须有伤害同类产品的国内产业. 受伤决心(找到损伤及测量损伤缘)包含了更多的漏洞. 我只提到两个人在这里.