UC知道翻译案例
来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/05/17 07:13:16
b. Harmony
Although harmony by itself generally does not receive copyright protection,Tempo Music Inc. v. Famous Mu-sic Corp. indicated that harmony might suffice. Duke Ellington's estate, namely his son Mercer and the Fa-mous Music Corporation, sued the executor of Billy Strayhorn's estate claiming that Strayhorn did not have a protected interest in his harmonic contributions to subsequent arrangements of "Satin Doll," a song by Ellington. The court narrowed the issue to whether Strayhorn's estate could assert a right to the harmony and revised melody of two such arrangements "when used or performed without the lyrics."
Examining the issue of harmony, Judge Sand acknowledged harmony as inherently derivative because it usually accompanies an already-created melody. Rejecting the Ellington Estate's argument that harmony cannot itself give rise to a copyright, the court held that, although certain chords occur inevitably from a given melo
Although harmony by itself generally does not receive copyright protection,Tempo Music Inc. v. Famous Mu-sic Corp. indicated that harmony might suffice. Duke Ellington's estate, namely his son Mercer and the Fa-mous Music Corporation, sued the executor of Billy Strayhorn's estate claiming that Strayhorn did not have a protected interest in his harmonic contributions to subsequent arrangements of "Satin Doll," a song by Ellington. The court narrowed the issue to whether Strayhorn's estate could assert a right to the harmony and revised melody of two such arrangements "when used or performed without the lyrics."
Examining the issue of harmony, Judge Sand acknowledged harmony as inherently derivative because it usually accompanies an already-created melody. Rejecting the Ellington Estate's argument that harmony cannot itself give rise to a copyright, the court held that, although certain chords occur inevitably from a given melo
湾和谐
虽然本身的和谐基本上未得到版权保护，节奏的音乐公司诉著名木碳化硅公司表示，和谐就足够了。艾灵顿公爵的庄园，即美世和他的儿子在发音乐公司的谅解备忘录，起诉了比利Strayhorn的声称Strayhorn没有在随后安排的贡献，他的谐波保护的利益“萨丹娃娃”，一首由艾灵顿遗嘱执行人。法院缩小了问题，是否Strayhorn的产业可以断言，以和谐和两个这样的安排，经修订的旋律“时使用或不正确履行的歌词。”
研究和谐问题，法官沙公认是天生的衍生，因为它通常伴随着一个已经创建的旋律和谐。拒绝埃林顿村的说法，和谐本身不能引起的版权，法院认为，虽然某些和弦有发生，给定的旋律，复合材料，地球资源卫星-尤其是在爵士乐和当代音乐不可避免地-有时，特别是和谐的创造性使用，这必然“影响心情，感受和健全的一块。”