请高手翻译一下,中翻英

来源:百度知道 编辑:UC知道 时间:2024/06/23 12:10:14
摘要:不安抗辩权是大陆法系合同法的一项重要制度,它赋予先履行方在后履行一方出现难以给付的情况下中止履行义务的救济,而预期违约是源于英美法系的制度,它给予合同一方当事人在合同订立后,履行前只要对方当事人明确表示不履行合同或预期不能履行合同,则受害方可提前解除合同的救济。这两项制度在功能上都赋予了当事人在合同订立后,履行期限前对于合同风险的充分保护,我国在制定合同法的过程中兼而收之,并加以改造,使两种制度都为我所用,从而在法的移植上取得一定成功,当然又由于两种制度的相似性与移植过程中的不彻底,造成我国在司法实践中很难搞清两者的适用范畴和区别,故本文就以两者的不同进行比较,分清两者的界限,并就我国就两种制度的引入与适用提出一些建议。

Restlessly contradicts the power is a mainland legal system contract method important system, it bestows on fulfills the side to fulfill in advance the situation in after which a side appears pays with difficulty to stop fulfilling the voluntary the relief, but anticipated breaks a contract is the source to the English America legal system system, it gives gathers the identical side litigant to work out after the contract front, fulfills so long as the opposing party explicitly expressed does not fulfill the contract or anticipated cannot fulfill the contract, then suffers injury the relief which only then ahead of time terminates a contract. These two systems all entrusted with the litigant in the function to work out after the contract, fulfilled in front of the deadline regarding the contract risk full protection, our country concurrently receives it in the formulation contract method process, and performed to transform, causes two kind of systems both to use for me, thus obtaine